86 views Filed under: Featured, advice or instruction, publishing, writing

Self-Publishing: Should I, or Shouldn’t I?

by Holly Jahangiri on Aug 15th, 2009

Tags Share

 

Comments (6)

Estimated reading time: 3 – 5 minutes

Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.

There’s an unfortunate stigma attached to self-publishing. That said, it is an effective approach for many writers that allows them to maximize their profits by cutting out the middlemen ? agents and publishers – provided they have the requisite skills: writing, editing, layout, formatting, cover design, book production, contract negotiation, marketing, advertising, publicity, public speaking, organization skills…

What? You thought you could just write the book and pay someone to print it and – tada! – it would end up on the shelves at Barnes & Noble? I know that’s my secret wish…

The stigma of self-publishing is this: Too many self-published books are badly written, unedited, amateurishly formatted, hastily produced tree massacres that reek of desperation.

Nevertheless, I opted to self-publish my first novel ? Lost Souls, Restless Spirits – an odd thing that defies categorization and synopsis, written in thirty days during one of the worst years of my life – well, you can see why there’s a stigma attached to self-publishing. And with a sales pitch like that, you can see why I need a real publisher with a large staff of publicists who can help me market the book.

To be honest, my first foray into self-publishing came because I saw an ad for Lulu.com and I was curious. I knew that my novel, written during my first attempt at NaNoWriMo ? National Novel Writing Month – probably did not have mass-market appeal, so I was willing to risk stigmatizing it in the discovery of new things. I gave up attempting to write a synopsis. I do have the skills needed to get a book ready for production. I also know the value of a good editor – I did not throw my book up on on Lulu without running it by a few of those folks and saying, “Does this make me look like a big fat ass?”

Even an experiment should reflect reasonably well on your abilities as an author. This is the same principle that drives us to wear something other than our pajamas to the grocery store. People we care about might actually see the darned thing. Who knows? It might sell. It might even be a hit…

Well, not with a marketing plan like I had (what marketing plan?) but it could happen. Self-publishing is a good choice for authors with tight niche markets and a product those markets need. Non-fiction tends to do quite well.

Early reviews were good. Early reviews? People actually bought this thing? I sought to return the favor, buying reviewers’ books and eagerly anticipating the nice things I would say about them. One simply paraphrased several common “urban legends,” and went from “large print” to “ginormous print” (about 10 words per page) halfway through the book! I rethought the plan: I now consider the cover price paid “hush money.” I didn’t post a review.

Should I have? Reviews are about the only “editorial oversight” possible with self-publishing. Most of us were raised to say nothing if we couldn’t think of something “nice” to say. But is our reluctance to give honest peer reviews really what’s “stigmatizing” self-publishing? It’s easy to blame poor writing, lack of editing, and a dearth of skills needed to bring a book to market and sell it – but would you keep making the same mistakes over and over again if someone took you aside early on and said, “No, that’s not how you do it. Look here…”?

Do you fantasize about writing a book? Come on over to Writing to Exhale and read my guest post: “So, You Want to Write a Book?” The first step towards making the dream a reality is all a matter of writing it. Then the real work begins. Are you up for it? Then let’s go!

Related Articles

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Comment »6 Comments
  • Reply » Luke August 20, 2009

    Desktop publishing applications bring self-publishing closer to the author. But it’s still not easy. You still have to actually learn to use those huge software from Adobe, Corel and Quark. Writing a book is no mean feat and self-publishing it is not for the faint of heart–you definitely need both sides of your brain there. lol on the “hush money” :-D
    .-= Luke?s last blog ..Hacker | Cracker =-.

    • Reply » Holly Jahangiri August 20, 2009

      Hah! Luke, you’d be amazed at how much damage desktop publishing apps can do, leading anyone to think they can do book formatting and layout, when the truth is, most people don’t know how to use, let alone create, a proper Word template. PageMaker? FrameMaker? Illustrator? Photoshop? Quark? Out of the reach of your average would-be author, financially. And you need good tools to do really professional-looking book layout. There’s a pretty steep learning curve, there, for most people. But it gives some people the illusion that “anybody can do it” even if they’re not doing it right and the output files will be spit right back at them from the print vendor. The technical side can be extremely frustrating.

      The sad thing is, desktop publishing apps are probably responsible for a lot of rejections by publishers, as well. If the publisher says “Courier, 12pt, 1″ margins all around,” they mean it. But no – clever authors try to send them Comic Sans 10pt with .5″ margins top and bottom, and 1″ margins left and right, and single-spaced – with bold and italics and all caps sprinkled throughout, and line justification (because, you know, it looks more professional – like a “real book”) and the fact is, it just makes the publisher’s job harder and says, “This writer can’t follow directions. They think they know our business better than we do. They’re going to be hard to work with.” The fact is, Courier looks horribly dated, but it’s a non-proportional font that lets someone with an experienced eye estimate word and page count quickly, just by glancing at the page.

  • Reply » Luke August 21, 2009

    ‘it gives some people the illusion that ?anybody can do it?’

    True. Just like anybody can buy a paintbrush. Now watch them create art. In a way, DP tools are similar to a brush. Only, they aren’t as cheap. :)
    .-= Luke?s last blog ..Install Security Software First =-.

    • Reply » Holly August 21, 2009

      This is true! Don’t get me wrong – I commend anyone who is willing to try writing or painting or learning any sort of new skills. I just urge them not to shortcut the process and shortchange themselves by thinking nifty tools will do it all for them. They’re only tools. You have to develop your talents and skills, too, and it takes time, hard work, and dedication. You cannot rush the process and expect a pleasant outcome.
      .-= Holly?s last blog ..Beastly! Ghastly! =-.

Get a GravatarLeave a Reply

Name: « Required

Email Address: « Required

Website URL: « Optional

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories
ss_blog_claim=a7582b85a064308846dffd2585b7270f