Use Your Words, Not Your Label-Maker

Use Your Words, Not Your Label-Maker

We need better ways of saying, “I’m not against whatever group it is you identify with, I just dislike you, personally.” It’s important to be clear on this point: disliking someone in particular does not make a person racist, sexist, ageist or any other -ist, but our failure to communicate insult when it’s intended and our reluctance to specify exactly why and what we dislike about the person in question often makes it seem so.

We are conditioned to avoid any display of genuine emotion or feelings. We are taught never to say “I hate you,” because “hate is too strong a word.” Acted upon, with violence, it’s a crime. But even just expressing disgust or strong dislike is now treated as a loss of emotional control, a weakness to be judged as harshly as crying or having a temper tantrum in public. Normally polite people, we are made to feel ashamed of thinking, let alone saying out loud, “I don’t like you.” We’re not taught to say, “I don’t like you when you [do this thing],” or even just, “I don’t like this thing you do, and when you do it, I don’t want to be around you.” Under a constant barrage of mustn’t-judge-each-other, I think we end up simply disliking and avoiding each other even more.

We habitually say “nothing personal” or “no offense,” deflecting our anger or disgust at some caricature, some abstraction, some stereotype, when what we have to say is, in fact, very personal. We don’t really mean “no offense intended,” we just don’t want our front teeth knocked out and don’t trust the listener to receive criticism or negative opinion like a mature adult.

By the time we’re ready to voice our criticism, it has been bottled up for so long that it surely feels like an assault. It explodes like a soda can dropped from the roof and gets negativity all over everything and everyone in its purview.

How ridiculous it is to dislike anyone based on the color of their skin, the texture of their hair, their choice of body art, or the nation in which they were born! How ridiculous it is to dislike someone for whom they love! What business is that of ours? How does it affect the quality of our lives at all? It is lazy shorthand for any rational reason to dislike anyone – and there are plenty of those when we get specific.

But try these on for size:

  • “I dislike you because you think for yourself and disagree with something I have said.”
  • “I dislike you because you don’t agree with me that I am better than you are.”
  • “I dislike you because you don’t obey me.”
  • “I dislike you because you have your own religious opinions and refuse to be converted by me to my beliefs.”
  • “I dislike you because you were born in another country.”
  • “I dislike you because you have green eyes.”
  • “I dislike you because your skin is a different shade of beige or brown than mine.”
  • “I dislike you because you speak more than one language. But I’m better at English than you are, so nanny nanny boo boo.”
  • “I dislike you because you speak my native language better than I do.”
  • “I dislike you because I am envious of the variety of colors and styles that look good on you.”
  • “I dislike you because your body art disturbs me.”
  • “I dislike you because I think your clothes are ugly.”
  • “I dislike you because your body art makes me question my own ability to make a long-term commitment.”
  • “I dislike you because you’re not having sex with a person I think you ought to be having sex with.”
  • “I dislike you because you are having sex with someone not of my choosing.”
  • “I dislike you because you choose not to procreate.”
  • “I dislike you because you choose to procreate and your children are annoying to me.”
  • “I dislike you because another [man, woman, child] hurt me in the past, but I can’t hurt them so you’ll do.”
  • “I dislike you because you don’t accept that a man has the God-given right to tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her own body.”

These reasons are pretty ridiculous reasons to dislike people, and don’t hold up to scrutiny in the light of day, do they? Still, they are more honest than the ones people often use to justify their hurtful attitudes and behaviors towards others. Looking these real reasons in the eye, how can we not laugh at ourselves and re-examine our relationship with ourselves and others?

It is difficult to express strong opinions honestly and directly, using straightforward language rather than trendy or pretentious psycho-social babble. We speak of “intersectionality” when what we really mean is, “Don’t pigeonhole me with your stupid stereotypes!” Stereotyping and lumping people together in groups is something anyone over the age of 40 had drilled into their heads as wrong, wrong, wrong. Individuality is to be celebrated! Until it’s not. Until it somehow threatens the homogeneity of the herd. So of course when criticism is leveled at us – say, at “white people” or “men” or “Boomers” or “cis-gendered, heteronormative Christians” – it feels hurtful. But if the shoe fits…

Consider how long some of these groups – white people and men, in particular – have been doing just that, to others. So of course it’s #NotAllWhitePeople (and everyone knows that, except that ones feeling overly defensive because they know there’s a grain of truth in the stereotype). Of course it’s #NotAllMen (except for the ones it is). What happened to the old fallbacks of, “I wasn’t talking about you, you know that!” or, “Oh, lighten up, Blondie!” and “Have a sense of humor!” boys? If you can’t just scroll on by, certain that the criticism doesn’t apply to you at all, or look inward and really think about how it does apply to you, personally, when it’s your group coming under fire, maybe think twice about ever doing it to others. It hurts when the tables are turned, doesn’t it? Doesn’t feel fair, does it?

Why aren’t there more jokes about white men? Oh, right – they’re not funny. 

The larger point is, if it stings – go talk to your fellow “white people,” your network of “men” or “Boomers” or “cis-gendered, heteronormative Evangelical Christians.” Work to fix the nasty little underlying truths of the stereotypes from within, because maybe it’s not a group you chose membership in and it’s not a group you can easily leave, but it is a group that you are best suited to talk to in terms it will understand.

That said, we also have too many performative, wannabe allies whose only contribution to anti-racist discourse is to try to outdo one another in their sanctimony as they stoke the fires to burn their own groups in a sort of auto-da-fé. They demand forced apologies and public struggle sessions, without allowing for real change in thinking or hope of redemption. They are almost as tiresome and exhausting as the disingenuous bigots who just need it explained to them one more time that racism still exists in the world.

Well, almost as tiresome and exhausting.

You know what’s hard? Loving the “unlovable.” Forgiving the “unforgivable.” It’s an aspirational goal; few of us will ever get all the way there. But let’s not turn every error in thinking, every slip of the tongue an “unforgivable” crime of the “unlovable.” No one’s going to pass that purity test when the spotlight is turned on them. There is a reason psychologists urge parents to focus on the unwanted behavior, and not on the person or their immutable characteristics.

A friend once introduced me to the term “misanthropic humanist.”

Misanthropic humanism is a useful term because it explains how a body of work can seem committed to a radical project for progressive sociopolitical change, while simultaneously holding forth a constant reminder that cruelty, injustice, stupidity, and death are inevitabilities that strike at all in the end.

I think I’ve found my people.

Now, do I hug ’em or shove ’em off a cliff? 

 

 

Refrigerator Magnet Poetry

Refrigerator Magnet Poetry

Let’s throw some words at the fridge and see what sticks…

The “Assignment”

As VP and Program Chair of Poets Northwest, in Houston, Texas, it’s my job to come up with interesting activities for the group once a month. Last month, we enjoyed a reading and workshop presented by Courtney O’Banion Smith, who won the Catherine Case Lubbe Manuscript Contest with her book, In Fidelity.

This month, I tossed the group what I hope was a fun little challenge, meant to get the creative juices flowing:

The topic for this month’s program is “Refrigerator Magnet Poetry.” Please go to Random Word Generator – WordCounter.net (https://wordcounter.net/random-word-generator) and generate 25 random words. Write a poem on any topic, and any form, using as many of the randomly-generated words from this list as possible. (Bring the list with you to the meeting.)

As discussed in our August meeting, prepare a brief (and unapologetic!) introduction for your poem. Consider including: Of your 25 random words, how many did you manage to work into your poem? Did you find inspiration in the randomness? Was it especially challenging? Were there any surprises? What form did you choose? Was it fun to write? 

Try to keep the introduction under 2 minutes.​

~ From Meetings – Poets Northwest (poetsnw.com)

You should know, by now, that I would never issue a challenge I wasn’t game to try, myself. In fact, a friendly challenge is a great way for me to pull myself out of a writing slump. These were my random words: lumber, library, impose, coherent, languid, furtive, learn, descriptive, harmony, abstracted, pencil, contract, change, match, bear, kiss, measly, level, sulky, occur, aboard, rewind, curb, obedient, wrench.

The Result

Did I have a moment, looking through the list, where I wondered, “What the hell have I done?” Yes. Yes, I did. I’ll admit that I was tempted, like the gamer I used to be, to “re-roll” until I got a list I liked. A list that made more sense on its surface. Instead, I pulled on my big-girl panties and I used all 25 words, in 25 lines of iambic pentameter just to add to the fun. It may have helped that I’ve been limbering up with the New York Times game, Connections.

I’m not sure if I found inspiration in the words, themselves, but as I cobbled them together, they suggested images. The images began to take shape, like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. I think I found inspiration in the challenge of making them fit together in a coherent whole.

Coherent! That was one of my 25 words! I only had 22 lines, to start. There was nothing in the challenge about line count. But the idea of 25×25 got stuck in my mind, and this seemed “too close but not quite” for my tastes. So, this morning, I began to edit.

Monday Morning Married Life

Sleep lumbers, languid, like a bear. I wake,
But barely there, at 4:00 AM. Cast off
Warm downy blankets of repose. Impose
Harsh winter’s chill: descriptive, like a kiss
Of ice to slap the hungry belly-growl,
To wrench the hoar-frost breath from sulky lungs.

The starving hunter roars his ravenous rage
And wakes, at last – a yawn, a furtive scratch –
To ask if I want coffee, strong and black.
I nod assent; coherent speech must wait.
This is the contract, secret to our match:
Love’s language is a library of grunts,
Half-smiles, nods, and gentle touch. We’ve learned
To read each other’s thoughts as they occur
Ignoring measly, petty quarrels there.
To climb aboard the week in harmony
Obedient
to the rhythm of the rails that run
Our parallel and level days, routine.

Abstracted from our hibernating den
My teddy-bear requests I pencil in
A moment’s time to change, rewind – to dine
Together in the evening’s hush – and I
In eagerness to curb this waste of life
Pursuing other people’s goals say, “Yes,”
And raise a glass to married Monday mornings.


This turned out better than I thought it would. I shouldn’t be surprised. About a dozen years ago, I found Writing Prompts – Creative Copy Challenge (wordpress.com). There, the challenge involved only 10 words and participants were encouraged to post, as comments, anything from a sentence to a story to a poem. It was a good way to jump-start the brain; occasionally, I got the bones of a good story from it. Even before that, I had a college instructor who would provide a list of “fifty dollar words,” the kind of vocabulary-builder words that no one uses in everyday conversation, and the assignment was to try to use five of them together in “one grammatically correct, non-run-on sentence, demonstrating understanding of the meaning of each word.”

If you think “run-on sentence” means “way too long,” go brush up on the definition. My challenge to you all is to see who can leave the longest grammatically correct, properly punctuated, non-run-on sentence in the comments. And don’t use weak words like “very.” Don’t pad it with excessive conjunctions. Aim for interesting – see if you can hold the reader’s interest. The record-holder for my challenge managed to write, if I recall correctly, a sentence having 157 words.

The poet’s job is to “write tight” and we do it better than most, when we do it at all. Our job is to make each word carry the heavy freight of meaning and emotion, sometimes stacked like containers on a cargo ship.

I hope this newsletter inspires you to pick up a notebook and a pen, or open Word, and write something. Remember: It doesn’t have to be “good.” But it will be – to someone. I once entered a “bad poetry contest” that was only open to people whose deliberately awful poems were accepted for publication by poetry.com, only to lose because my poem wasn’t bad enough. I tried hard, too!

Go forth and have fun!


If you’re in the Houston area and are interested in poetry, please visit Poets Northwest – you’re welcome to come as a guest and to join our club, a chapter of the Poetry Society of Texas and are also affiliated with the National Federation of State Poetry Societies. 

Think You “Hate” Poetry?

Think You “Hate” Poetry?

Why Do You Hate Poetry?

I have not read this book, yet – I just bought it on the strength of an article in The Atlantic, “Why Do Some People Hate Poetry?” by Adam Kirsch.

My own theory has been that people don’t hate poetry at all – they hate bad poetry. Pompous, pretentious, precious poetry. Unfathomably deep metaphors. Tongue-twisting, time-traveling language and syntax. Contrivance. But they lack the self-confidence, or feel it would be too rude or too harsh to say, “I have no idea what this means, and it’s such a chore to read it that I no longer care to contemplate it.” The fault may lie with the poet, not the reader.

Is There Such a Thing as “Bad Poetry”?

Oscar Wilde claimed that “All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling.” In “The best bad poetry out there,” Dan Chiasson writes of a 1930s anthology of bad poetry called, The Stuffed Owl, that “Excess of love often leads, in poetry as in life, to worse results than neglect. Most of the worst bad poems here are so fragrantly and moistly loved that our supercilious amusement at them seems savage.”

But I would suggest to the reader that there are many poets and many poems – far too many to be read by one person in one lifetime. If you’ve attempted to make heads or tails of several poems by one poet, find another. All poets can be a little hit-or-miss. And readers’ tastes vary. There’s nothing wrong with that, or with you, Dear Reader. I may write one poem that truly touches another soul, and the next will, quite frankly, suck. I am glad of PCs and pixels; if I were still feeding dead trees to a wastebasket every time I wrote something bad or barely adequate, I would feel an unrelenting guilt. God forbid I should turn you off poetry altogether.

Does Poetry Leave You Feeling “Stupid”?

There’s something between “deep” and “doggerel” and I aspire to find my happy place on that spectrum. A poet might make more money writing “greeting card verse,” and might have more admirers writing overly “deep” navel-gazing verse full of symbolism nobody really understands – in the same way that the naked Emporer had “admirers” who were too terrified of him to tell him the truth.

Honestly, I don’t understand every word of “The Waste Land” by T. S. Eliot, either. But if you listen to him read it, himself, a few times, if you think about it, and read what’s been written about it so that you understand the references in context, it becomes clearer. A young adult in 2023 does not share some of the specific experiences that Eliot talks about. A little more effort is required of us, today, than might have been required by the reader who lived through World War I. That effort pays off, I think. Keep in mind that poetry is meant to be read aloud and heard, because it is naturally metrical, lyrical – it was never meant to be solely for the eyes and brain.

Now compare the author’s own reading of it to that of Fiona Shaw: Fiona Shaw The Waste Land by T.S – YouTube

Now, find yourself a favorite poem and try reading it aloud. Get someone else to read it aloud. See if you can find a recording of the author reading it out loud. It may be impolite of me to say this, but I think Fiona Shaw performed Eliot’s poem better than he did!

 

Reading Poetry Aloud

Reading Poetry Aloud

Bring the words to life and make them dance!

“The words on the page are asleep or dead until a human voice breathes life into them. Even the poems that I didn’t understand, or care for – as a pupil at school – sounded better read out loud. Their rhythms, rhymes, the sound of the words is often hypnotic and mesmerising – and that’s how it should be. Poetry is the magic of everyday words.” – Paul Cookson

Not all of us enjoy “performing” poetry. Or speaking in public. Whether we are competent – or even quite good at it – it’s just not our “thing.” If you enjoy performing at open mics and poetry slams, this newsletter may not be useful to you, but I hope you’ll add your tips and techniques to the comments, as I’m bound to miss a few.

Even if it’s not a joy, most of us can muster the wherewithal to read, recite, or perform our poems. And most of us can get better at it.

I asked poets, “What are some of your pet peeves when listening to poetry spoken aloud?” The first answer I got made me laugh out loud:

“People who suddenly acquire a mid-Atlantic accent when they read their poem aloud.”

He’s heard me read and swears he didn’t notice me doing this, but I tend to acquire an awkwardly British accent, which gets weirder as I self-consciously attempt to stop talking that way. Another poet suggested that perhaps that’s because poets were more likely than the average viewer to watch BBC dramas. That’s a kind theory, anyway. I have noticed others affecting accents and speech patterns that are not their normal way of speaking, and I wonder if they’re even aware that they’re doing it? Here’s a fun bit of trivia that came out of this discussion – did you know that there has emerged an Antarctic accent?

My pet peeves? I have two:

“Rambling preambles and self-conscious disclaimers.”

Avoid making excuses, disclaimers, or apologies. When reading your own poems, don’t say, “I wrote this in 15 minutes last night but kept getting interrupted by my colicky baby,” or “This isn’t very good, but, well, you’ll see…” If an introductory note is needed for context, prepare one as if for someone else to read. Keep it short and sweet – let the poem stand on its own legs. Prefacing a poem with an apology for how good it’s not is like arguing with a compliment even before you get one. Don’t do it.

“Stumbling over unfamiliar words.”

Sometimes we read others’ poems and stumble over unfamiliar words; sometimes, we write poetry containing familiar words we’ve only read in books – they’re not unfamiliar, but we’ve never heard them spoken aloud and don’t know how to pronounce them. Sometimes, we know how to pronounce them, but our tongues trip over them, anyway. That may be an indicator that we ought to rewrite the poem, if it’s one of our own. I once wrote a speech for Toastmasters that contained the word, “encephalography.” I know the word and its pronunciation, but my mouth just won’t cooperate. Before giving the speech at a contest, I changed it to “brain scan.” The technical term was not the point of the speech, and there was no point in drawing so much attention to it.

Another mentioned:

“Speaking too quietly.”

Yes! This is not the time for “inside voices.” Imagine that you are speaking to a person at the back of the room. Stand up tall to make room for your lungs. Use your diaphragm when you breath, speak, or sing – see Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises & Benefits (clevelandclinic.org) to support your voice.

For many listeners, their pet peeve is:

“Speaking too fast.”

Ugh. I’m often accused of speaking too fast! And it’s hard to slow down, because I feel like I’m exaggerating every word and syllable, and it feels to me like I’m being condescending. It feels unnatural. Speaking slowly takes practice, but it is important if you want listeners to understand what you’re saying.

And finally:

“Speaking in a monotone.”

Speaking in a monotone robs the poem of its energy and loses the audience’s interest quickly. Practice reading the poem silently, several times. Then practice reading it aloud. Try standing in front of a mirror, watching yourself as you read, or reading it to a friend across the room. Record yourself, then play back the audio or video to listen and watch for any rough spots. You might imagine that you are acting out the poem, or saying it as lines in a play.

In all cases, practice makes…better.

Tips for Reading Poetry Aloud

  1. Suggested by Billy Collins: Read the title of the poem and the author’s name. Read any introductory notes given by the poet (but see #2, below). Repeat the title. Read the poem, then repeat the title again.
  2. Avoid affectations, such as taking on an accent you don’t use in everyday speech.
  3. Avoid “rambling preambles,” excuses, disclaimers, or apologies. Let the poem stand on its own legs. Never argue with a compliment and certainly never argue with one before you get it.
  4. Look up unfamiliar words and practice their proper pronunciation. Consider a rewrite if it’s still causing your tongue to trip and poem is your own.
  5. Speak with enough volume everyone in the room can hear you clearly. You don’t have to shout, but make sure people at the back of the room understand every word. Practice diaphragmatic breathing and “project” your voice.
  6. Speak s-l-o-w-l-y and clearly. Talking too fast is a sign of nervousness. Never let ’em see you sweat!
  7. Use vocal variety and energy in reading the poem to hold the audience’s interest and attention.
  8. Memorize the poem if you can, so that you can make eye contact with your audience.
  9. Practice and don’t be afraid to ask for feedback on your delivery.

Just for Fun: “The Exquisite Corpse” Game

Oh, that sounds ghoulish, doesn’t it? The name comes from one of the lines that resulted when a group of Surrealists played the game in Paris in the 1910s and 1920s: “Le cadavre exquis boira le vin nouveau.” (“The exquisite corpse shall drink the new wine.”)

Exquisite corpse – Wikipedia

I tried this out with family, recently, and the only other person who had heard of the game was my 9 year old grandson, who had played it in Art class in 3rd Grade.

We wrote a collaborative poem following the traditional adjective-noun-verb-adjective-noun format on a theme of “water.” No structure or theme is required, but I thought it might lead to a somewhat more coherent result that a group of mixed ages (9 to 60) and interests would enjoy. And here it is:

Translucent waves flow over coral.
Majestic cascade plummeting, breathtaking feature –
Wet seahorses dream about dry meadows –
Liquid cloud snows ice cream.

We also created two drawings: an alien creature and a train. Interestingly, the first person’s alien head had no eyes, nose, or mouth, but the second person (without peeking at the first section!) gave the alien eye-stalks in the armpit beneath a tentacled arm.

Give it a try!

3 Exquisite Corpse Drawings Assemble More

And please, if you have any pet peeves or suggestions for reading poetry aloud, let me know in the comments.

Rainbows on Her Eyelashes

Rainbows on Her Eyelashes

Selma Martin’s debut book of poetry, In the Shadow of Rainbows, is the work of a talented and empathetic poet. The importance Martin places on her readers is evident in the dedication, in the poet’s statement of purpose, and in the poems, themselves – simple words and vivid images that appeal to our humanity through images that evoke an emotional response.

Some of the poems that most resonated with me include “The Lore,” a peaceful meditation on being present and observant in a still moment, and in reading “I Almost Died,” I was transported to the breathtaking, otherworldly snorkle-scape of a tropical coral reef. It’s an image I know first-hand, and one Selma Martin paints convincingly in just a few brief lines.

“The River” and “Calamitous Portend” will haunt any parent who has ever endured fear coupled with the crisis of faith in their own ability to protect the precious life entrusted to their care.

There are over 60 poems in this volume – savor them. Read and reread. Feel them.

Wondering about the title of this post? Read “She’ll Slide Off A Full Moon, Tickle Your Eyelashes,” by Selma Martin.

Selma Martin is a retired English teacher who lives with her husband in Japan. She has been a freelance writer of nonfiction, short stories, and poetry since 2017, and I have read along and watched her grow in skill and confidence. Learn more, and read more, at her website: Selma – Finding the extra in the ordinary (selmamartin.com)

Kathryn A LeRoy is a fellow writer and photographer whose cover photograph captures the misty shadows of rainbows – rainbows that cast colors and light into the shadows. Her website is Kathryn A. LeRoy (kathrynleroy.com)