First Things First
Words matter. Words have meaning. And although, sure, โlanguage evolves,โ that doesnโt mean you get to change the accepted definitions of dictionary words to mean whatever you want them to mean today.ย You donโt get to wake up one morning and decide that โ86โ means something more and different than โnixโ (see โCockney rhyming slangโ) or โremoveโ (as it is commonly understood in the restaurant biz) or โthrow the bum outโ (as anyone whoโs been 86โd from a bar can tell you โ because most of them are alive to tell you this). You can certainly invent new words. You could, over time and bit by bit, change their meaning to be more in line with modern day needs. We still use โcarriageโ today, even though the original understanding of โcarriageโ rarely applies. And thereโs a reason criminals devise their own terms for things, but most adults donโt adopt those outside of novels and Hollywood thrillers.
Read Ask George: Where Does the Term โ86โdโ Come From? | St. Louis Magazine.
But some folks want you to believe that โ86โ means to โkillโ or โassassinateโ someone, and that when paired with a number thatโs routinely associated with a person, somehow constitutes an incitement to do just that. You could use the words โend,โ or โterminate,โ or โoff,โ or โiceโ or any of these slang terms to mean the same thing โ but that doesnโt change their more commonly understood, dictionary defined meanings. At least I hope not โ considering corporate America routinely terminates employees it wants to 86 โ I mean, get rid of. And when I say, โTurn off that dim bulb,โ I mean end the flickering from the almost-burnt-out light bulb. What else could you possibly think I mean? The flickeringโs giving me a massive headache, as is this whole debacle.
In What Does โEighty-Sixโ Mean? | Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster acknowledges that,
Among the most recent senses adopted is a logical extension of the previous ones, with the meaning of โto kill.โ We do not enter this sense, due to its relative recency and sparseness of use.
โI hate to see the guys always getting eighty-sixed,โ she said, using military jargon for killed in action. โNot fair.โ
โ John Kifner,ย The New York Times, 3 Feb. 1991The most common meaning ofย eighty-sixย encountered today is the one that is closer to its service industry roots (โto refuse to serve a customerโ). Given how many meanings the term has picked up in less than a century of use, however, itโs anyoneโs guess as to what meanings it will pick up in the decades to come.
You donโt get to call it โincitementโ to โkillโ or โassassinateโ someone, just because you need a little more drama and attention in your life. Just because you want to distract people from the fact that you are actively advocating for things that will do them real harm. In 10 years, maybe weโll use โ86โ to mean โspurious propaganda meaning whatever the hell the party in power wants it to mean at the moment.โ But for now, it should be clear that the most common usage harkens back to its restaurant and bar service days.
Investigating every instance of what is and ought to be a fairly mild expression of political protest as if it were an act of terrorism is an absolute waste of taxpayer dollars. But if you insist, then at least investigate every Republican who followed โ86โ with โ46โ โ or all the times their leaders have called on the people to kill, shoot, or otherwise assassinate those they dislike. See, for example: violent rhetoric | PBS Newsย Donโt be hypocrites about it.
This Administration Wants to 86 The Following Words
Forget George Carlinโs brilliant monologue on the 7 Dirty Words You Canโt Say on Television. There is now a list of three hundred and sixty one words the current administration is trying to expunge from our vocabularies. How dare they, these people who whine about freedom of speech at every turn and imagine themselves victims of โcancel cultureโ!? You will find the words the feel attacked by, here, and I exhort you to use them liberally (which, in case you didnโt know, means โgenerouslyโ and โmunificentlyโ and โfreelyโ no matter what certain political types would have you think). For a surprising and wonderful take on this, read Here are all the words Trump wants banned โ in one article โ Baptist News Global โ an article from Rodney W. Kennedy, a pastor and writer in New York state, using every one of them. God bless the man.
I did write a poem a while back, using a much shorter list of words โ I think theyโve added about 200 since then! โ see Poetry from Banned Words | Holly Jahangiri. But one is never enough and now, we have a larger vocabulary to work with, and I encourage you to get creative. Feel free to share your poems or flash fiction here, or send me a link to your longer works (if itโs a spammy link or comment, it will be 86โd so fast itโll make your head spin, but I promise youโll live).
In case you need ideas for where to use these marvelous words, try poetry, short stories, non-fiction articles, blogs, social media posts โ anything that will be read, where people will be emboldened and made to understand that words are not scary things. They are the key to communicating โ a very human thing. A very First Amendment-protected thing in the United States of America, with precious few exceptions (most largely ignored, these days, as they have to do with safety and truth in advertising, both of which seem to be quite passรฉ). Contrary to what many seem to believe, freedom of political speech without fear of reprisal,ย not the freedom to cuss out your parents and neighbors, is the primary raison dโรชtre for the First Amendment. Now go use it before we lose it.
Did you miss any of the earlier posts from this month or last?

Freedom of speech has been ruined in more ways than one. I’m close to recording my latest rant for my YouTube channel, and one of those rants is how the “majority” has taken a word that was created by black people and turned it into something they used to beat us down, only to try to take it back when they realize something they do is now having the word used towards them; sigh…
I wonder how George Carlin would deal with today’s psyche; hmmm…
In spite of holding the First Amendment as near-sacred, I do believe there are some common-sense limits; it should not apply to:
I don’t run the world. Many people have reason to be happy about this.
Let me guess: “woke”? It’s a good word, a word worth borrowing, when used to mean what it was meant to mean in the first place and not twisted into an insult.
But you’re talking to a “girl” who runs like a – well, like an inept gazelle. I’ve never “run like a girl.” Or thrown like one. Or understood why doing things like a member of my sex did them was supposed to be a BAD thing. It’s a stupid insult.
“Fight like a man”? Go watch “The Shadow Strays.” Kickass women. I am starting to love action flicks with kickass women. I know a few – oh, well, shoot, I birthed one.
A lot of people out there need to grow up. Unfortunately, calling them “childish” is an insult to children. I’m looking forward to your “rant,” Mitch.